You Got the Intro. Now Don’t Blow It.
A few tips for founders on winning great talent
A founder we recently invested in thanked us profusely for helping the company land two exceptional early hires: a founding research scientist and an engineer.
The connections we made mattered, but both candidates had plenty of other options and closing them was entirely in the founder’s hands. We can lay up an introduction, but like a first date, what happens next depends on the people in the room.
The best founders understand that. They treat the interview process as a chance to build trust, create momentum, and show exceptional candidates why this is the company – and team – they should bet their career on.
How great founders win great people:
Speed as a weapon
The fastest hiring outcomes we’ve seen are highly intentional. One founder closed an exceptional engineer within 48 hours of meeting him at a FYSK showcase. Another hired two engineers the week after we hosted a dinner for the company. And the founder we mentioned above closed both candidates within a week of our introductions.
These founders were building companies, shipping product, talking to customers, and managing a hundred other priorities, but they treated promising candidates with urgency. They followed up immediately, created momentum, and made every next step clear.
We know that is easier said than done. Recruiting is one of many things competing for a founder’s attention, and it is easy for a follow-up to slip. But exceptional candidates move quickly, and the founders who move with them are often the ones who win.
A strong candidate should never be wondering when they’ll hear from you. If a candidate has to nudge you, the process has already lost momentum. Make it a goal to keep things moving whenever the ball is in your court.Sell the dream, not the job description.
Great founders do more than explain what the company is building today. They make the future feel tangible.
They do not lead with, “We’re looking for a Python backend engineer.” Almost no one wakes up identifying as a Python backend engineer. They lead with the problem, the stakes, and the future someone could help create.
Compare that with: “Energy is the foundation of every AI system. We’re working on uranium enrichment to unlock abundant, clean power—and if we succeed, the future of AI runs on infrastructure we helped make possible.” They might even add: “By the way, our backend is built in Python. Even if you do not know it yet, I’m sure you can figure it out.”
The best engineers are looking for the opportunity to help build a generational company. They want to understand what this could become, why it matters, and why this team has a real chance of making it happen.
3. Don’t make candidates play detective.
Strong candidates will ask about revenue, growth, compensation, competition, risks, and the challenges ahead. Answer those questions clearly. Engineers notice when founders are evasive. We recently heard from a candidate who asked about compensation and was told the company was “competitive,” but was not given a range. When they pressed, the numbers shared felt surprisingly low relative to the company’s massive recent funding round. Their takeaway was harsh: the process ranked “bottom decile” on both compensation and transparency. They still agreed to continue the conversation but the founder had already created doubt that did not need to be there.
If you are asking someone to devote years of their life to building alongside you, it is hard to earn that commitment while gatekeeping the information they need to evaluate the opportunity.
Transparency during the interview process signals how you will communicate once they join and begins establishing the culture of the company before their first day.Let your team do the selling.
Candidates are evaluating the people as much as the company. Give them meaningful time with the strongest members of your team, especially the people they would work with most closely.
We recently heard this from an engineer after meeting one of the FYSK-featured companies: “The idea was not an immediate ‘wow,’ but it also didn’t strike me as a bad direction. For me, it came down to the passion, charisma, and caliber/pedigree of the team. Once I met more people on the team, I was so much more excited about working there.”
Exceptional engineers want to collaborate with exceptional peers. They want to know who they’ll be solving hard problems with, who they’ll learn from, and whether this is a group that will push them to do the best work of their career. People want to join the coolest, most interesting, most brilliant club they can get into.Don’t lose on the offer.
The strongest engineers are often considering several opportunities at once—and they rarely evaluate an offer alone. They share it with friends, former colleagues, founders, and other people who have seen dozens of competing packages.One engineer recently told us that while he was assessing his offer, a founder friend was blunt: the comp package he received was far too low, he was worth significantly more, and the alternatives were better. Because that friend had seen many comparable offers and knew him well, the feedback carried real weight.
A low-ball offer, especially one with weak equity, can quickly remove you from consideration. Research the market and compensate early employees appropriately for the risk they are taking. Raising significant capital from a top-tier investor does not automatically make the opportunity feel derisked to a candidate.Early employees only get to make one bet with their time. Your offer should reflect the value of that bet.
And lastly…remember every candidate talks.
An interview process leaves an impression far beyond the candidate in the room. Treat every candidate as someone who will share the experience with 30 other exceptionally talented people (because they often will!). Engineers talk to their friends, roommates, partners, former colleagues, and to us at FYSK. When founders run a thoughtful, respectful process, word travels, and it becomes easier to attract even more exceptional people.
Because we’re often the connector, we care deeply about what happens after the introduction. The founders who consistently make candidates feel valued are the ones we’re most excited to keep introducing to great talent. Run a great process, and the flywheel starts to work in your favor.
Thank you to Camille Ricketts for chatting with me about this topic! For more of Camille’s musings on talent, company-building, and the occasional extremely important TV or movie recommendation, check out their newsletter, Early Days.



